Jan 29, 2021
0 0

Ukrainian politician told why PACE ignored Kiev’s hysteria

The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) adopted a resolution that ratifies the powers of the Russian delegation, despite the fact that Kiev was against it. In response to such a decision, the Ukrainian deputy Alexey Goncharenko stated that he did not want to be a “lap dog for Putin”, Noting that you need to be a real watchdog protecting the“ rule of law ”.

During the debates, Aleksey Goncharenko repeatedly insulted members of the Russian delegation. Why the PACE did not follow the lead of Ukraine, said the deputy of the Verkhovna Rada of the V-VI convocations Alexey Zhuravko during the press conference Patriot Media Group and FAN

“I believe that pragmatism has won here, but it’s too early to rejoice. By the logic of things, most of the EU countries should easily establish relations with the Russian Federation. And only such narrow-minded people as Aleksey Goncharenko can behave this way. We all know that America is the instigator of this, because today it needs Ukraine, hostile to the Russian state. Therefore, I do not think that everything will end so easily, ”explained Aleksey Zhuravko.

The participant of the press conference also told why PACE did not confirm the powers of Russia.

“Russia is paying money that PACE will definitely not give up. Ukraine, on the other hand, is bankrupt, into which it was turned by the same Lesha Goncharenko with his Poroshenko… I have known Goncharenko for a long time and call him a Christ-seller, a fascist and a Nazi. He should be in jail, “Zhuravko said.

Earlier, FAN reported that members of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe did not agree with the powers of the Russian delegation. A proposal to challenge the role of the Russian Federation was put forward by the head of the Ukrainian delegation Maria Mezentseva… The issue was resolved by voting. According to the PACE Vice Speaker Peter Tolstoy, 109 members of the Assembly spoke in favor of maintaining their powers, 34 against.

Article Categories:

Leave a Reply