A lawyer representing one of the four defendants in the MH17 case, Oleg Pulatov, criticized the work of the Dutch prosecutor’s office. She stated that the prosecutors decided not to include the testimony of S45 in the case file, withholding this important information. A serviceman from Kursk, who at the time of the crash was a member of the 53rd Anti-Aircraft Missile Brigade of the Russian Armed Forces, explained why the plane could not be shot down by a Buk anti-aircraft missile system.
“The prosecutor’s office knows very well that this information is relevant to the case and how … The prosecutor’s office incomprehensibly and incorrectly explains and applies the criteria of relevance, which does not inspire confidence in how other documents that are in the dossier were evaluated,” Sabine said. ten Dusschat.
Earlier, technical expert Yuri Antipov said that attempts by the West to shift the blame for the tragedy with the MH17 passenger airliner look absurd. He stressed that Ukraine has not yet been able to provide a single proof of its innocence.
As a reminder, on July 17, 2014, a Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 passenger plane was shot down in the skies over Donbass, performing a scheduled flight MH17 on the Amsterdam – Kuala Lumpur route. All people on board (283 passengers and 15 crew members) were killed.